According to the Curonian Spit management plan data, as many as 81 percent of young residents of Neringa poorly assess their ability to purchase housing here. This is no longer a suspicion. It is a diagnosis recorded in a state document: it is not the buildings that are disappearing, but the community.
The Neringa municipality has long had a prepared response to this – “we can do nothing.” We cannot build, we cannot equip housing, we cannot retain young families, because everything is regulated by ministries, the national park, heritage protection, inspections.
And that sounds convincing. The Curonian Spit is indeed one of the most regulated places in Lithuania. This needs to be said honestly: the regulation is real, the procedures are long, and working here is harder than anywhere else in the country.
But there is a difference between “difficult” and “impossible.” And that difference costs us people.
Speaking of this, it is immediately worth distinguishing two things. Neringa is changing, and not every change is a loss. An old warehouse or an abandoned farm building turned into a guesthouse takes nothing away from the community – often the opposite, something that stood dilapidated for decades is fixed, and the neighborhood comes alive. The loss begins elsewhere: when a function used by the community disappears.
And such cases are not lacking even in documents published by the municipality itself. Scientific purpose buildings on Pervalkos Street are being converted into leisure ones. On the Green Path – a former university practice base. On Preilos Street, a house with café and shop premises is turning into private housing. In Juodkrantė, a catering establishment after reconstruction became actual leisure premises.
Science, training base, shop, café. Each decision separately can be completely legal and understandable. But put in a row they show a direction: the number of places where the community does something is decreasing, and the number of places where others rest is increasing.
This is most clearly seen in Nida, in the former pioneers’ camp area. This project has been talked about a lot, so I will remind only one fact: even in the 1994 General Plan, this place was designated for municipal residential housing. Today, fifty-two apartments will be built there, and not a single one is intended for municipal housing. No one set the condition to allocate at least some of them to teachers or doctors.
A place that belonged to the community in plans for three decades became another market project. Not because Vilnius forbade it. Because no one seriously negotiated it on site.
Let’s be precise – the direction is not homogeneous. Some requests were rejected, and a warehouse on Rėzos Street is being converted into a cultural building. This is important because it proves a simple thing: public interest control is possible. The question is only whether it is consistent.
Here we hear: the municipality had to issue a permit. Partly true. If the project meets all requirements, refusal is not possible.
But that is the second part of the story. The first happens earlier. Whether the purpose can be changed at all is determined by territorial planning documents. And these are prepared and approved by the municipality itself. Therefore, the real question is not whether we could reject every request. The real question is why we have not created rules over so many years according to which functions important to the community could not be so easily lost.
I think the answer is simpler than one would like. Not malice. Fatigue.
When you fight with the same system for many years and lose more often than you win, you start saving your strength. You stop raising questions whose solution will take longer than a term. You start negotiating for individual objects because systemic changes seem too difficult. And one day you notice that the phrase “we can do nothing” has turned from a description of the situation into a working method.
That is human. But it costs dearly.
Because at the same time, the Curonian Spit management plan already states that it is necessary to assess the appropriateness of a special law for the Curonian Spit and to form a working group to address the issue of the disappearing community. The municipality is listed there as one of those responsible. So the doors are not locked. You just need to approach them.
And you can start with one principle: when development takes place in an area that was associated with community needs in the plans, the municipality negotiates the part of the public interest – municipal housing, community space, or compensation. It does not ask. It negotiates. This requires neither a new law nor permission from Vilnius.
Public interest is not a nice phrase before elections. It is very concrete: will municipal housing appear or not. Will there remain space for the community, or will it turn into yet another set of apartments. Will the municipality negotiate for its people or watch the processes from the sidelines.
Neringa is not powerless. But those representing it are tired. And a tired municipality stops defending – and starts explaining why it could not defend.
I do not believe such excuses. And I think this young engineer from the gym could and should have stayed.
Read more Man found murdered in Panevėžys – 26-year-old suspect detained intoxicated
