This issue is relevant not only to the residents of the capital. Every morning, people from the district travel to Vilnius, where their workplaces, children’s schools, healthcare facilities, universities, and main services are located in the city. When one of the capital’s main arteries is under repair, the consequences are immediately felt by the people of Nemenčinė, Riešė, Avižieniai, Rudamina, Pagiriai, Nemėžis, Zujūnai, and other surrounding settlements.
Read more Šilutė community is mobilized: «Can an accountant teach Lithuanian?»
The administrative boundary does not exist in daily travel. The traffic jam in Vilnius city quickly becomes a traffic jam in Vilnius district.
September should not be a surprise
At the end of August, nearly 100 repair points were recorded on the JUDU map, and work was still ongoing on about 14 kilometers of street sections. Among them are Švitrigailos, P. Lukšio, A. Goštauto, Kalvarijų, S. Konarskio, Jogailos, Trakų, V. Kudirkos, and other important city streets.
The municipality announced that part of the carriageways would be repaired by September 1, but some larger projects will continue in the fall, and some even next year.
Vilnius city leaders explain that the work is proceeding according to schedules and that a similar scale of work occurred in previous years. However, at the beginning of September, traffic intensity in the capital increases annually by about 9–20 percent. This means that increased flows are not an unexpected circumstance – they can and must be anticipated.
September 1 comes every year at the same time. Schoolchildren, students, teachers, and residents returning to work after vacation return to the streets. At the same time, the flows of people traveling from Vilnius district to the capital increase significantly.
Therefore, the schedule of the most intensive works should be arranged so that by the beginning of September, at least minimal throughput is restored in the main movement corridors. The statement that traffic jams form in Vilnius every fall cannot be an excuse. On the contrary – it is a basis to plan the work more responsibly.
District residents do not have many alternatives
A Vilnius city resident facing a street under repair can often choose another public transport route, travel on foot, or by bicycle. Many Vilnius district residents have far fewer such alternatives.
Some settlements still do not have sufficiently frequent and convenient public transport connections. The journey often requires several transfers, and one still has to drive by car to the nearest stop or transfer point. If repairs are underway at the city outskirts or main arteries, not only private cars but also suburban buses stand in traffic jams.
One restriction in the city center may seem local by itself. But when a main artery and its possible detour route are repaired simultaneously, transport queues stretch to the city outskirts. For a district resident, this means not a few minutes longer trip but sometimes an additional hour on the road.
This lost time is also the cost of city planning. People pay it by being late for work, failing to take children to school on time, missing doctor appointments, and having to leave home earlier.
The problem is not the repair itself, but the sequence of works
In different public announcements, we see different numbers: some mention 25 streets or sections under repair, while the JUDU map shows nearly 100 work sites. Both numbers can be correct if different accounting methods are applied, but such information does not allow residents to understand the real impact on their journey.
City infrastructure cannot be planned as a list of separate, unrelated objects. It must be considered as one network. Closing or narrowing a main street shifts traffic to surrounding streets. If they are also under repair, entire city districts and entrances to the capital begin to jam one after another.
What should the city and district do?
First, Vilnius needs one public and constantly updated infrastructure works calendar. It should publish not only the work location but also their start, planned end, actual progress, reasons for delays, responsible contractor, and expected impact on traffic.
Second, works must be prioritized according to their impact on the entire transport network. By September, traffic should be restored first not where the project is easiest to complete, but where restrictions would most affect public transport, main arteries, and entrances from surrounding municipalities.
Third, Vilnius city should involve Vilnius district municipality in planning the works with the greatest impact before starting repairs. The district municipality, in turn, cannot limit itself to forwarding residents’ complaints. We must actively represent people’s interests, coordinate suburban bus routes, and demand that the impact on main district directions be assessed.
Fourth, joint city and district public transport planning is needed. Suburban bus schedules, city routes, transfer points, and ticketing systems must operate as one network. As long as traveling by public transport is much longer and more complicated than by car, urging people to switch to the bus will not solve the problem.
Fifth, it is necessary to expand the “Park and Ride” parking lot network near main entrances to Vilnius. District residents must have a real opportunity to leave their car on the city outskirts and comfortably continue their journey by frequently running public transport.
Finally, communication must start before traffic jams appear. Residents need not a general call to “plan the trip,” but specific information: which routes will be affected, how much the trip may be extended, where transfer points are arranged, and what alternatives are offered.
The capital and district are one movement region
Vilnius has the right and duty to repair its infrastructure. But a large number of works alone is not proof of good management. The real result is a safer, more convenient, and reliably functioning transport system.
We must stop planning Vilnius city and Vilnius district as two separate islands. People live daily in one municipality, work in another, take children to a third place, and cross administrative boundaries without even noticing.
Therefore, the capital’s repair works must be assessed on the scale of the entire Vilnius region. It is possible and necessary to repair a lot, but this requires a more precise sequence of works, more public control, and constant cooperation between city and district municipalities.
September will come next year too. Hopefully, then it will not catch the capital’s planners or the district residents traveling to Vilnius every morning by surprise.
Read more Football coach Vladimir Yevich has died
